Defence Minister Peter MacKay Joins the Chorus of Parliamentary Lawyers Telling Coalition Partners to “Go F _ _ K Themselves”
and
Environment Minister & Lawyer Jim Prentice Literally Thumbs His Nose at Covert Regime Change and International Justice
© 2009 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
A third lawyer in Parliament has now told the coalition on the diplomatic record to “f _ _ k” off. The difference between Peter MacKay and Bob Dechert and Derek Lee is the fact that the Defence Minister is a Queen’s Counsel – the highest distinction of honor and in recognition of professional integrity bestowed by law societies.
And add lawyer Jim Prentice to the list of nose thumbing Chinada complicit and loyal, who also was signalled he was in the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy on December 2, 2009. As his defence ministry cabinet colleague responded during the very first query of Question Period, he effected an embellished Clooney Maneuver to deliver his opinion on behalf of the Chinada High Command.
The saying ‘a picture’s worth a thousand words’ is to be slightly amended to “a picture helps justify covert regime change”. These photos accurately capture the moments when Peter MacKay and Jim Prentice employ the lexicon to send communiqués to the breathing-down-their-necks coalition.
View video [Prentice: 0:59; MacKay: 1:11]
MacKay entertained former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on September 11, 2006 as Foreign Minister when on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 she arrived in Canada to publicly thank us for helping with re-routed in-flight transcontinental planes on that tragic day and geo-politically as President Bush’s envoy to add to the diplomatic record what’s documented in Comparing the Chinada Threat to Islamist Fundamentalism.
Three years, three months later and now more acutely aware than ever of what that visit represents and (i) continuing to be fully cognizant of all military intel on China’s interests in the country and the coalition’s activities and intentions and (ii) knowledgeable about the inevitability and imminence of covert regime change, he chose to put on record his and the Government of Canada’s position: “Hey coalition, go f _ _ k yourselves”.
That's a repeat of what's documented in The Transfer of Power Triggering Event.
MacKay isn’t just a lawyer, he’s a Q.C.. That’s a rarely granted honor within the legal profession. What it signifies is summed up in the following report:
Constitutional reform: the future of Queen's Counsel
The Lord Chancellor, Department for Constitutional Affairs
London, England
November 2004
C is not merely a professional rank or title or kite mark of quality, although it is all those things, it also denotes a quasi-judicial role which lies at the centre of the Rule of Law in the English legal system.
[...]
[One of the two] most beneficial result[s] of this development is that the [...] public can rely upon their integrity, ability and independence. […] Few, if any, question or doubt the integrity of QCs and few selected, if any, have ever soiled it.
[...]
QCs, besides their obvious legal expertise, are considered to be rational, methodical, thorough and objective. They are perceived to have a collective interest in the pursuit of justice and to be public spirited and civic minded. In short, their integrity is unchallenged and their independence beyond doubt.
[...]
The QC is far more than a mere rank within a profession It is an appointment which endorses the barristers' existing commitment to the administration of justice As such, the rank of QC is the standard for conduct and propriety throughout the entire bar.
[...]
From induction, the Bar student learns the importance of the code of conduct and the junior bar relies upon it to underscore their approach to their work. The gloss on the code of conduct and the height of achievement is personified by the rank of QC. The QC sets the standard for the conduct of the entire bar.
[...]
A QC's advice on process, practice and law is widely relied upon by the judiciary.
Source: http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/qcfuture/responses/qc332.pdf
MacKay’s arrogant belligerence, along with fellow lawyers Prentice, Lee and Dechert is more evidence how Chinada complicit and loyal Parliament’s upper crust is, as is the judiciary’s chiefs and associate chief justices and judges and the Bar, especially law society executives, law deans and former and current senior and managing partners of the country’s largest law firms.
Recall what was observed in Obama, Obama, Biden & Clinton: Four Lawyers Inhabit the White House and What That Means for the Reform and Demilitarization of Canada's Administration of Justice.
